- 1 what subject matter appears in works by the impressionists?
- 1.1 Please complete the security check to access brainly.com
- 1.2 Why do I have to complete a CAPTCHA?
- 1.3 What can I do to prevent this in the future?
- 1.4 What subject matter appears in works by the impressionists?
- 1.5 What subject matter appears in works by the impressionists?
- 1.6 What did the Impressionists aim to doTheir subject matter and their distinctive painting method - Essay Example
what subject matter appears in works by the impressionists?
Please complete the security check to access brainly.com
Why do I have to complete a CAPTCHA?
Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property.
What can I do to prevent this in the future?
If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware.
If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices.
Cloudflare Ray ID: 40179f1e42c39750 • Your IP : 22.214.171.124 • Performance & security by Cloudflare
What subject matter appears in works by the impressionists?
Camille COROT, 1829-30
This policy will not prevent the belated fame of Corot (1796-1875) from growing up. Corot, whose work comes to an end when Impressionist painters appear on the scene, is already a modern painter and can be seen as a precursor of Impressionists .
He excels in "plein-air9quot;(outdoor) landscape painting, and his portraits are every bit as good as his landscapes for they release so much expressiveness. The Impressionists and many great painters after them will make of Corot a source of inspiration, and will dedicate him an immense admiration. Moreover they will try without success to obtain his participation in their 1st group exhibition in 1874.
A NEW CONTEMPORARY REALISTIC PAINTING
A new style of painting, that will take the name of Impressionism in the year 1874, will develop in France between 1860 and 1890. This evolution in painting history is not an isolated movement, for independent pictorial art will evolve everywhere in Europe in the second half of the XIXth century towards a much more modern painting that better correspond to industrial progress acceleration , and changes in the way of life .
Painters which will be named, depending on time and context, "Independents9quot;, "Intransigents9quot; or "Batignolles Group ", at last "Impressionnists9quot;, will be engaged in a struggle, begun with Manet in 1860, against an old and dusty workshop painting art with established conventions that had become too restrictive for modern time, in order to have their new realistic way of painting recognized.
This new painting will be the result of a series of reflexions and intentions which preceded it, that of Barbizon School's painters, and that of neo-impressionist painters of the Meetings of Saint-Siméon in Honfleur ( Boudin, Jongkind, Dubourg. ) that Monet attended as a young painter.
The new realism of the Impressionists definitively rejects the classical research of an ideal of beauty and an eternal essence of things, and postulates instead as preponderant the real vision compared to any learned conventional theory. The work that results from this vision is claimed to be relative : relative to the conditions under which the same scene can be observed (lights, skies, colors. ), and relative to the painter himself.
Beach at Sainte-Adresse
Claude MONET, 1867
Manet's formula : "I paint what I see, and not what others like to see", summarizes this claim of the artist to give his personal vision , that of his own subjectivity.
Their great concern about giving representations translating the artist's real vision with its immediate nuances, will lead them to undertake multiple pictorial researches and to forsake a number of rules which then passed for immutable in painting : precise drawing and contours, use of flat colors with attenuated variations, light and shade convention.
By doing so, the future Impressionists will introduce a number of new pictorial processes : use of light tones, division of tones (an orange is represented by juxtaposition of two pure colors, red and yellow), form and volume resulting from colored brushworks instead of drawing-contour, thickness of paint .
The Impressionist movement is thus well at the origin of a great artistic revolution , today still the object of studies and analysis, which will be put at the service of a new conception about the role and place of painting in society.
Forsaking historical or mythological subjects, Impressionist painters will deeply renew painting themes to better picture their contemporary world .
They seek their subjects in the eternal world of nature as well as in their daily world , each painter developing his own set of themes. For them, a subject is worth another , which counts being more their vision and their pictorial search to paint it.
The Impressionist step aiming at representing a surrounding reality which is relevant only at one moment and under given conditions , the execution of a painting is fast , close to the draft. It acts of a one moment painting, of a fugitive impression.
Last point, the act to paint is asserted as a personal pleasure , as well as an autonomous spiritual value . In this conception of art for art , the artist is free of his personal creation.
A woman ironing Edgar DEGAS, 1869
A woman ironing
Edgar DEGAS, 1869
If Impressionist masters are now at the firmament of painting, it is important to recall to which extent their painting was misunderstood and rejected at their time . Let us quote their contemporary Theodore Duret (Art critic 1838-1927) in his " History of the Impressionist painters " : "It should be said, in homage to these men, that contempt, opprobrium, poverty, never led them to deviate at any time of their way. They held on with their so detested way of painting, without considering, even for one moment, to modify it in any way in order to be accepted of the public. They waited, during many years, all the time necessary for the public to come to them and that a change of opinion occurred, supported by their confidence in the principles and the value of their art . "
Over twenty-five years, from 1860 to 1886, in the century where photography was invented, Impressionist painting was going to leave strictly figurative representation, to invent a new style of artistic representation which was going to mark the beginning of nonfigurative modern painting . One knows today how far that was going to lead.
One can consider that in 1886 , year of their last group show in Paris and of the first exhibition of their works in the United States , successfully organized by art dealer Durand-Ruel , the Impressionists had achieved their goal and were at last recognized. Impressionism will then quickly find a broad echo in Europe and North America.
MANET REREADS CLASSICS
Manet opened the way to Impressionism while rebelling, using the exact means of traditional pictorial representation that he had so thoroughly learned , against academic conventions that had become so rigid that they prohibited painting contemporary subjects.
Thus, after other works like " The absinthe drinker " - 1858, his " Luncheon on the grass " (1863) or his " Olympia " (1863) are classically written subjects reactualized with genius in contemporary world, with so realistic transpositions - in particular the nudes - that they would cause scandal and be violently attacked by critics of that time.
But, even if with " The music at the Tuileries " - 1862 , Manet already prefigures Impressionist painting - of which he will be subject to influence in return -, he never truly belonged to the Impressionist movement, and appears on the other hand as the one who did allow its birth.
Indeed, because of the scandals he caused, and due to his immense talent as a painter, Manet quickly gained notoriety , and from 1864 will become the leader of a quarrel opposing the old ones and the modern ones. For the future Impressionists, he will become, after Corot and Courbet, an example of a new manner of painting, and a new guide, around whom they will naturally gather and, through whom, for some of them, they will meet.
From 1865, famous writer Emile Zola, a school fellow of Cézanne in Aix, will defend Manet's cause and his new painting in "The Event", and become the supporter and historian of the arising movement . Painting started an all-out revolution concerning not only painting themes, but also soon its pictorial means .
ART MARKET BEGINNINGS
While economic development changes society, painting is subject to a great liberal evolution, in the sense that it will no longer be, as in the past, the fact of "court painters " working at the service of some princes or temporal powers which order works to them, but more and more the fact of independent artists selling their paintings to buyers .
Art will go from now on, as well as any other product, into a market logic. In order to find a public and purchasers, it was a necessity for the artist to be able to exhibit his works, which became the first and existential concern for this new generation of artists.
THE STATE-RUN "PARIS SALON" ART SHOW
If some art dealers, such as "Le Père Martin" , Durand-Ruel and later Petit start playing an active role in art market, their shops or the exhibitions which they organize give quite modest possibilities for the artists to get known compared to the large national window which constitutes the " Official Salon " of Paris. It is there that successes and prices of art works are decided.
In 1863 , the Salon becomes annual and a jury made up of members of the Academy of Fine Arts and preceeding medal-holders of the Salon selects works to be exhibited. For the only year 1863, 4000 works were refused out of 5000 paintings presented by some 3000 artists, which led to the creation of the " Salon des Refusés", inaugurated by Napoleon III in 1863.
Surprisingly, most future Impressionists quickly obtained their first admission to the Salon, but will thereafter frequently be refused . If Pissarro, Bazille and Degas (continuously from 1865 to 1870), were best accepted at the Salon, Cézanne, will obtain , in spite of his protests, only one and single participation at the Salon in 1882!
If the Impressionist movement certainly is a group of painters having in common artistic ideas and researches, it also is on a more basic level a movement of painters refused at the Salon and trying to exhibit their works.
A NEW GENERATION OF PAINTERS
Pissarro is the senior of the Impressionists. At the Academy Suisse (a workshop which provided models to young painters), he meets Monet in 1859, then Guillaumin and Cézanne in 1861.
In 1862, Monet enrolled at the famous "9Eacute;cole des Beaux-Arts" (School of Fine Arts) where he will meet Renoir, Bazille and Sisley .
Through Manet , with whom he get acquainted as early as 1862, Degas will later meet Monet and Renoir in 1866 at the famous Café Guerbois located in the Batignolles Street, where the painters of the "Group of Batignolles" (as one designated the future Impressionists at that time) used to meet.
These artists are all aged between 20 and 30 , and will weave between them multiple links. The strongest relationships will be those of Monet with his friends, Renoir, Bazille, Sisley, quartet which appears to be the founding members of the Impressionist group.
After they left the Fine Arts School, during the years between the Salon des Refusés (1863) and the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, they will experience alternately successes and failures at the Salon , while at the same time anxiously searching their artistic personality. In the heart of their concerns:
to take on and develop the Realism of Courbet and the painters of Barbizon practicing outdoor painting, with a specific research about light and color effects
to paint and develop new themes in art that relate to new aspects of modern life
to work out a new style of vision and a pictorial representation allowing to better account for movement and permanent change of their time.
Claude MONET, 1869
Metropolitan Museum of Art
By 1869 , Monet and Renoir as they were executing side by side a series of paintings in a leisure place on the Seine River called "La Grenouillère" frequented by Parisian middle-class people, would depict the agitation of this place with small fast brushworks, characters at the state of draft, mobile reflections on water. thus rendering the "impression" which emerges from this place rather than details. This word will give its name to the new movement only five years later.
1874 - THE FIRST IMPRESSIONIST GROUP SHOW
After the war of 1870, and the civil war "The Commune" which followed in 1871, the Impressionists were going to continue to work with a great enthusiasm in the direction which they had taken. From now on, they were certain of their way of seeing , and, relieved from the yoke of the cultural policy of the Second Empire, they expected an increased recognition and an increase in their sales.
They were going to be terribly disappointed, and knew still more failures at the Salon than before war.
The young IIIth Republic is then unstable, and the deep shock undergone by french society with the Commune in 1871 will generate an intellectual climate of distrust towards any innovation or artistic revolution.
Little by little the idea that they could just as well do without the Salon get installed in their mind, strengthened by art dealer Durand-Ruel . December 27, 1873, they deposited the statutes of a "Limited company of the artist-painters, sculptors".
The first show of the Impressionists took place in April 1874, Boulevard des Capucines, in an apartment lent by photographer Félix Nadar , with 31 participants , the painting by Monet entitled " Impression, sunrise " (1872-73) giving its name to the Movement.
Claude MONET, 1873
It counted 3500 visitors , against 400 000 for the Official Salon, and was held without Manet for whom the Salon was to remain predominant.
The IMPRESSIONIST MOVEMENT and ITS PAINTERS
THE IMPRESSIONIST MOVEMENT
Musee d'Orsay, Paris.
By Alfred Sisley.
Two influences on Impressionism
were photography - to help fix a
scene, and the invention of the
collapsible tin paint tube in 1841
by American painter John Rand.
BEST MODERN PAINTING
Impressionism is arguably the most famous French painting movement ever. The actual name "Impressionism9quot; was coined by the French art critic Louis Leroy, after visiting the first exhibition of Impressionist painting in 1874 where he saw Impression: Soleil Levant (1872) by Claude Monet. Ironically, Monet only decided on the title when completing the exhibition catalogue, and almost named the work View of the Harbour at Le Havre! In total, between 1874 and 1882, the Impressionists staged seven exhibitions, all in Paris.
First appearing in Paris during the late 1860s and early 1870s, Impressionism was not recognized initially as anything special. Many of the members of the group were at odds with the official Salon, the organizing body for the French Academy of Fine Arts, whose selection-jury operated with unpredictable severity. So although other painters were impressed by some of its early works, Impressionism was not acknowledged as an important style of painting, either by art critics, collectors or the public. As a result, most Impressionist painters suffered severe financial hardship, and all had to fight for attention and commissions from patrons and critics alike. Despite friendships with leading figures in other areas of the creative arts (like the writer Emile Zola and the poet Baudelaire) mutual support and reassurance within the group was the critical factor in its survival.
Musee d'Orsay, Paris .
By Claude Monet.
For details of colour pigments
used by Impressionist painters, see:
WORLD'S GREATEST ARTWORKS
For a list of the Top 10 painters/
For other important trends
similar to Impressionism, see:
from about 100 BCE.
Main Characteristic of Impressionism
Pure Impressionism, as advocated by Monet, was outdoor plein-air painting, characterized by rapid, spontaneous and loose brushstrokes: supreme examples being his series of paintings of Rouen cathedral, Waterloo Bridge, Gare Saint-Lazare, haystacks, and water lilies. Its guiding principle was the realistic depiction of light; Impressionist artists sought to capture fleeting moments, and if, during these moments, an object appeared orange - due to the falling light or its reflection - then the artist painted the object orange. Or if the sun turned the surface of a pond pink, then pink it would be. Naturalist colour schemes, being devised in theory or at least in the studio, did not allow for this. Loose brushwork, coupled with a non-naturalist use of colour, gave the movement a revolutionary edge, and opened the way for movements such as Expressionism and Fauvism.
The Impressionists' main priorities included: (1) the immediate and optically accurate depiction of a momentary scene; (2) the execution of the whole work in the open air (no more preparatory sketches and careful completion in the studio); (3) the use of pure colour on the canvas, rather than being first mixed on the palette; (4) the use of small strokes and dabs of brightly-coloured paint; and (5) the use of light and colour to unify a picture, instead of the traditional method of gradually building up a painting by outline and modelling with light and shade. For more, see: Characteristics of Impressionist Painting (1870-1910).
The roots of Impressionism lay in the naturalism of Camille Corot (1796-1875) and the plein-air painting methods of the early 19th century Barbizon school led by Theodore Rousseau (1812-67). Impressionists specialized in landscapes and genre scenes (eg. Degas' pictures of ballet dancers and Renoir's nude figures). Portrait art was another popular genre among Impressionist painters - it was after all one of their few regular sources of income - and still-lifes were also painted.
Note also the influence of Japonism (notably Ukiyo-e prints) on the development of Impressionism and its exponents like Monet, Degas, Mary Cassatt and others.
What Impressionism Sought to Achieve
By the year 1863 the sentry which allows the visual messages transmitted by the eye to penetrate to the brain only after a rigorous censorship, had admitted most aspects of visual truth, but there were two that had not yet officially passed the censor. They were (1) the colour and vibration of light and (2) the density of air. No one had ever painted the true colour of sunshine and shadow, and hardly anyone had thought it worthwhile to suggest that the density of the air is not always constant, that a picture could be painted, for instance, of a landscape seen through a heavy mist or fog.
But both these visual discoveries were, fundamentally, subheadings of a larger discovery. What the Impressionists did, almost without knowing it, was to realize the phenomenon of transitoriness. The artist who carries his canvas out into the open air and attempts to record every nuance of what his eye sees is in a very different frame of mind from the artist who constructs his picture in his studio from a series of preparatory sketches or studies. His eye may not be more searching but it becomes conscious of a different set of visual data. He becomes less and less concerned with the nature of the object - figure or landscape - he happens to be painting, and more and more conscious of the appearance of the object at a particular moment of time.
For Monet, at work on a picture of Rouen Cathedral, what his eyes encountered was not a Gothic structure but an envelope of air of a certain density through which the Cathedral could be seen and by which its appearance was modified with every shift of light. For him, therefore, his very subject matter was altering its nature at each hour of the day. Since therefore, the emphasis in every Impressionist painting, is on the moment of time, it was natural that Impressionists should deliberately seek out momentary effects. In a painting by Monet of the entrance to the Gare St Lazare, the most arresting features are not the iron bridge and the building behind it, but the steam that drifts under the bridge and the locomotive, deliberately placed on the extreme left in order to give the impression that it is on its way out of the picture.
Such selected moments in time are the keynote of those landscapes by Monet, Pissaro, and Sisley in which one is always aware of the time of day, the season of the year, the precise strength of sunlight or the density of the atmosphere, AND also of the figure compositions of Degas and the later work of Monet, in which the true 'subject' of the painting is the sudden turn of the head of a waitress in a cafe, the momentary gesture of a dancer or a woman ironing or trying on a hat in a milliner's shop. These problems were tackled by Claude Monet and Camille Pissarro to the exclusion of a great many of the qualities which previous artists had considered essential.
The Impressionism movement furnishes the clearest instance in the history of art of a new visual discovery, made in a spirit of pure research, which produced in the long run a new kind of beauty. In its purest form it painted solely what the eye saw. "Monet is only an eye. But what an eye!" said Cezanne, inadvertently capturing the virtues and weaknesses of the whole school.
The Seven Greatest Impressionist Painters
Claude Monet (1840-1926) became the centre of attention in the movement. Helped by the coastal and beach scene Impressionist Eugene Boudin (1824-98), he carried out the Impressionist program quite conscientiously. It was his supreme attempt at complete objectivity. If nature, during any particular quarter of an hour, was 'off colour' (and nature is often guilty of surprising lapses) Monet would blindly follow her into a morass of chromatic bad taste. His own sense of colour harmony was sometimes deplorable. But he had the greatest knowledge of plein air painting, and introduced very advanced ideas on landscape painting into the Impressionist circle. Camille Pissarro (1830-1903), a great teacher, was the most prolific printmaker of the group and the only one to show at all the Impressionist exhibitions. A lifelong anarchist, he made almost no money and his emotional attachment to certain colours and scenes meant that he didn't have quite the same ruthlessly objective attitude to painting as Monet. By comparison, the loner Alfred Sisley (1839-1899) - the most dedicated landscape artist after Monet - lived a middle-class lifestyle, and only became dependent on his art in middle age. He was as good an observer as Monet, but his range was narrower: he was content to record the more 'normal' conditions of light and in consequence his landscapes avoid the appearance of being 'stunts' that Monet's often give. These three painters - Monet, Pissarro and Sisley - formed the shock troops of Impressionist landscape painting.
Manet and Degas were associated with the movement but they specialized less furiously in telling the Impressionist truth and nothing more. They were better artists if only because their interests ranged beyond the mere 'look' of things.
Manet (1832-83) was revered by the other Impressionist painters. He was related to the French Emperor, and by the age of twenty-nine was already accepted as the leading figure of the new realistic painting, prior to Impressionism. Noted for his modern approach to oil painting and his revolutionery reinterpretations of neoclassical themes, he was interested above all in becoming re-accepted by the Salon. Manet was objective as any painter. Before him perhaps Velazquez was the painter who least obtrudes his own temperament, and it was in homage to Velazquez rather than to Titian that he painted his notorious Olympia. He was more conscious of the impact of light than Velazquez, but except in his later, outdoor, sketches done under the influence of the Impressionist landscape painters, he did not adopt the 'divisionist' technique by which Monet strove to render the vibration of light.
Degas (1834-1917) was not particularly interested in the impact of light, but he was fascinated by something equally transient - the unpremeditated gestures of everyday life. His eye pounced with the swiftness of a hawk on such gestures, and he gave them an additional air of naturalness by picking up at least one hint from the camera. The camera cannot compose a picture. It merely takes a portion of what is before it and cuts it off like a slice of cake. It has no compunction in slicing, say, right through a figure; it has no sense of balance, of symmetry. Out of this haphazard treatment Degas evolved a new system of composition. He gives the impression of a snapshot, casual and fortuitous, but for all that there is nothing casual in his design. The balance is as careful as in any composition by Poussin, and much more daring. He made a subtle art of seeming casual. His characters have the air of being taken unawares, yet they never have that appearance which the camera invariably gives, of having been frozen in mid-gesture, Degas's most able follower was the English Walter Sickert, who, without having Degas's hawk-like pounce, saw life in much the same way - taking unawares the fascinating little accidents that make up its sum. Degas recorded them with some measure of disillusionment; Sickert did it with a kind of painterly chuckle. Two years younger than Manet, Degas came from the same social background. The two painters, both pure city people, became friends and frequented the same circles in Parisian society. Degas was arguably the most complex of all the founders of Impressionist art: initially he hated plein-air painting and preferred working in his studio, where he demonstrated amazing versatility in drawing, watercolours, pastels, and sculpture.
Another artist who came from a wealthy family was Paul Cezanne (1839-1906), son of a banker from Aix. Due to his shyness and southern, rustic ways he had problems in the best Parisian circles. When he was given a large exhibition in Paris in 1895, he had not exhibited a painting in the city for 20 years. Auguste Renoir (1841-1919), who came from a very poor family, literally had to starve to succeed as an artist. He was helped by Narcisse Diaz, one of the founders of the Barbizon School, and worked closely with Monet on landscapes before moving into studio work involving portraiture and figurative painting. Despite early similarities, Renoir's art was different to Monet's. It was not really concerned with fleeting moments or transient depictions of light. Renoir's sunshine is eternal, even his female nudes are eternal. They are women seen as a child might see its mother: soft, radiant and eternal. To this extent one might say that Renoir is part of the main stream of art rather than revolutionary Impressionism.
The most important female Impressionist painters were Berthe Morisot (1841-95) and the American Mary Cassatt (1845-1926).
The Impressionist Circle: Some Personal Details
Manet and Degas - Socially and Financially Secure
Edouard Manet was the artist who was regarded by the other Impressionist painters as their leader, with a strange unanimity which seems unusual to us today. We only know his work, while the knowledge of the artist's personality has only been passed down by reports from contemporaries. Edouard Manet was born in Paris in 1832 and along with Pissarro was the oldest in the group. His mother was related to the Emperor, and Manet never lost contact with the leading circles. Because of his social status and his great talent he would certainly have been admitted to the Ecole des Beaux Arts, but instead of this he chose to attend the studio of Thomas Couture. Couture was an excellent teacher and because of his reputation his pupils were able to show paintings in the Salon quite early in their careers. Manet's first submission was highly regarded, and by the age of twenty-nine he was already accepted as the leading figure of the new realism. The image of the poor artist certainly does not apply to him. Edgar Degas, who was two years younger than Manet, came from the same social background. Manet's attention was drawn to him as he copied paintings in the Louvre. The two painters became friends and frequented the same circles in Parisian society. Manet already had contact to other open-minded artists from which later the group of Impressionists was to take shape. He brought Degas into this circle.
Cezanne - the Unsophisticated Provincial
Another artist who came from a wealthy family was Paul Cezanne, son of a banker from Aix-en-Provence. Admittedly he had serious financial problems for many years because he was afraid of admitting his love of art and somewhat illegal living conditions to his rather tyrannical father. It was because of this that he only came to appreciate his father's fortune in the second half of his life, at a time when he was already so well-known as a painter that he probably would have been able to live off the proceeds from his paintings if it had been necessary. Because of his southern, almost rustic ways he had problems in the best Parisian circles. As well as this, his demure and difficult to understand paintings did not attract sympathy for his work. This was responsible for his remaining unknown longer than the other Impressionists. Cezanne withdrew more and more from his circle of friends. From 1885, he lived separated from his wife and children in Aix in self-imposed solitude, at first on the country estate which he jointly inherited, later, when the estate had been sold, in a small house on the outskirts of the town. When he had problems climbing the stairs to his loft studio he had a simple, but large studio built. His increasing fame was hardly recognized by the artist himself, in fact, he rejected it. When Cezanne was given a large exhibition in Paris in 1895, he had not exhibited a painting in the city for almost twenty years. The young art dealer Ambroise Vollard (1867-1938) took the risk of holding a Cezanne exhibition in his gallery. Until then Cezanne had been regarded by his artist friends and in the small circle of people who were interested in his work at all at the most as a mediocre talent. But his exhibition opened people's eyes: here the greatness of the artistic personality could be guessed at. Vollard presented works from a master of modern art. It was not just his friends who realized that, but also the public now recognized Cezanne's immortality. No other painter from the group left such deep impressions for the following generation of artists. In his lifetime he stood alone, only supported in his artistic desires by a few friends such as Renoir and Pissarro.
Camille Pissarro, the oldest of the Impressionists, was born in the West Indies. So that he could receive an ample education the young Camille was sent to a French boarding school. When his education at school was over, he returned home with the unshakable desire to become an artist. In 1855 he was eventually allowed to study to become a painter. After fruitless attempts in various studios he finally ended up with Charles Suisse who limited his free painting school to the provision of space and models and did not make any corrections. After this Pissarro remained free from any academic compulsions and turned towards landscape painting. At first he was fascinated by Richard Parkes Bonington (1802-28) and John Constable (1776-1837), but then he orientated himself to Charles-Francois Daubigny (1817-1878), Camille Corot (1796-1875), Gustave Courbet (1819-77) and Jean-Francois Millet (1814-75) who themselves struggled to be accepted. In 1859 he was already able to exhibit a painting in the Salon. In the same year his parents also moved to Paris. This improved his living conditions for a time. However, when he chose his parents' servant to be his wife, his father, angry at the marriage unbefitting his son's social class, threw the young couple out of the house and withdrew any future financial support. Pissarro was, among the friends, the one who practically never got away from financial worries for the whole of his life. He had a family to feed and was the only one of the Impressionists who did not find a rich patron and supporter. Although he painted incredibly fast, he always had low prices and his way of working meant that he always had a number of unfinished paintings. Light was always the most important artistic element for him. But because of this he was very dependent on the landscape and had to consider the time of day and finish working as soon as the light began to fade. He was also dependent on the weather. He got into the habit of working on several canvasses at once, often the same motif at different times of day, for example, one in the morning mist and another picture in shining mid-summer sun. Admittedly he had to abandon several motifs when he was unable to complete them in one working period when, after a long period of bad weather, the season changed.
Sisley - Benefited from Family Business
Another young painter who came from a prosperous house and therefore was able to follow a career as an artist without any worries about his financial situation was Alfred Sisley. His mother was musically minded and when the son showed strong tendencies towards drawing, his father only made a half-hearted attempt to persuade him to begin a business career. He agreed to his son beginning an artistic training and his fortune often enabled the young artist to help poorer artist friends in critical situations. Sisley painted for years without making himself in any way financially dependent on his work. He married, had children and lived a middle-class lifestyle. During this time Renoir created his famous portrait of the Sisleys dressed in the expensive clothes befitting their social class. Actually the only Impressionist thing about this painting is the treatment of light. At the end of the 1860s, Sisley's father became seriously ill, the family business got into difficulties and had to close. Sisley was suddenly faced with the necessity of supporting himself and his family from the sale of his paintings. He moved in with Monet and later to the neighbouring Les Sablons, in a landscape in which he was especially able to work well.
The personality of Claude Monet had a special place in the development of Impressionism. In the artistic area he became the centre of attention in the movement. It was also he who introduced very advanced ideas on landscape painting into the circle of young artists. Claude Monet was born in Paris but his youth was spent in Le Havre where his father, who was a merchant, supplied ships. The harbour life and the wide beaches made strong impressions on the boy. He entered art by drawing - notably cartoons. In those years the thriving press was very dependent on illustration of all types. Even people whose reading abilities were not so strong could understand cartoons and illustrative sketches and therefore the editors attempted to introduce as many pictures as possible. Monet trained himself from journals such as these, and due to his great talent he quickly found his own style. When the possibility of exhibiting in a carpenter's window arose, the young man was able to sell his drawings to tourists. However, much more important was the fact that Eugene Boudin (1824-98), a brilliant painter of coastal scenes, noticed the young Monet and recognized the young man's talent. He had worked in Paris for a long time and was able to assist the progress of the young painter in the metropolis. Monet went to Paris with the proceeds from the sales of his cartoons and some money from his father and began working at the Academie Suisse. Soon he came into contact with other young artists who would one day be called Impressionists. Monet was the member of the group with the greatest knowledge of plein-air painting. In Le Havre he had made comprehensive studies and had been taught by Boudin. He was therefore able to share his practical knowledge with the others. At the beginning of 1861 Monet had to start his military service and leave his friends. He volunteered for Africa where he soon became ill and had to return home. Eventually his family bought him out of the army, a possibility which the State offered to wealthy citizens. In 1862, Monet again painted in Le Havre together with Boudin and the Dutchman Johan-Barthold Jongkind (1819-91). Jongkind was a very skilled landscape painter and the abilities of the two older painters flowed through their clever pupil into the circle of young Impressionists in Paris to which Monet returned at the beginning of 1863. Monet no longer attended the Academie Suisse. Like most of his friends he moved to Charles Gleyre to continue his studies there. Soon the Studio Gleyre was to become the nucleus of French Impressionism.
Morisot - Female Painter From Affluent Urban Background
Berthe Morisot was the only woman who belonged to the early core of Impressionist painters. Her path to art corresponded to the conventional attitudes which were open to a daughter from a good home. Her father was prefect of the department Cher, she was born in Bourges in 1841. She spent her youth in Limoges, together with her oldest sisters. When her father was called to the highest office in Paris, the family moved to an elegant house in Passy, and the girls went to an exclusive private school where music and art were part of the curriculum. When Berthe and her sister showed some talent, it was natural for the mother to promote this talent. Although the painters who taught them, warned the parents that if they became good painters, it would have a very negative effect on the social advancement of the attractive girls, the parents would not be put off. The girls had a spacious studio built in the garden and were encouraged in their studies by renowned artists like Corot, Henri Fantin-Latour (1836-1904) and Puvis de Chavannes (1824-98) who were often guests in the house. Berthe, who soon stood out as the one who worked more intensively, received a lot of stimulus and very early access to the Salon.
Bazille - Painter, Supporter and Collector
One of the artists who strongly promoted the union of Impressionists was the very talented Frederic Bazille (1841-70), an especially cordial, open and obliging person. His early death was the reason for his work only appearing in the early phase of Impressionism. Bazille came from Montpellier where his parents belonged to the leading social class. His parents had a liking for the arts and therefore had absolutely nothing against their son training to become a painter, especially as he had already shown a certain amount of talent. However, his father insisted on him studying medicine and taking art lessons as a second subject. Bazille entered Charles Gleyre's studio and he increasingly fell behind with his medicine studies. But he always retained a good relationship with his parents. His rich father supported him to the best of his ability and it happened quite often that Bazille was the good Samaritan in the circle of friends whose financial situation was not so stable. He gave them money for food and let them use his beautiful studio. As he had a helpful and sympathetic nature, always mediated and conciliated in the hard conflicts between the friends, he became the good spirit among the artist folk.
He became an especially good friend of Auguste Renoir, who was one of those artists who came from a poorer family and literally had to starve to be able to follow his path to art.
Renoir - The Sunshine Painter
Auguste Renoir was born in Limoges in 1841, the son of a tradesman. He came to art in a roundabout way. First he was employed as a porcelain painter, then he went through various stages of working as a commercial artist before he was finally able to attend the Gleyre studio where he was joined by Claude Monet and Frederic Bazille before the year's end. Gleyre closed his studio every year in spring for a few weeks' holiday, and during this time the friends went to Fontainebleau to paint in the forest, a diversity which was kept up for several years. They preferred Chailly or Marlotte, as Barbizon was too busy for them. In Marlotte, a settlement of a few farmhouses, they lived in the Auberge de la Mere Anthony where Sisley above all was attracted to the landlord's daughter Nana who appears as a model on many of Renoir's paintings.
For Renoir's further artistic development the meeting with one of the successful artists from the Barbizon School was an experience of such far-reaching consequences that, when he was older, he still reported the story of this meeting to his son. Several rowdies from Paris abused him as he painted in a clearing in the forest. Renoir became involved in a struggle and suddenly received help from a tall limping man who used his wooden leg and crutch as weapons and so got Renoir out of the situation. This helper in need was Narcisse Diaz (1807-76), one of the founders of the Barbizon School. He had a look at Renoir's work and took an active interest during the following days. In a short time he made the young colleague dispense with his heavy dark painting and showed him how much shimmering light there is in dark shadowed areas.
After 1868 the friends did not travel to Fontainebleau regularly. For Renoir above all the twilight under the trees was no longer enough, he wanted sunshine in its full intensity. The banks of the Seine became the chosen area of the young artists for the next years. Only Monet remained for some time in Chailly.
Impressionist Routine and Travels
The constant change from staying in the country and spending months in Paris remained the basic routine of the Impressionists for many years. Nature offered them huge stumulation but they needed the city to further their careers. Only Manet and Degas were pure city people and very seldom visited the countryside. As it was, after Fontainebleau, the Normandy coastline became a favourite destination. It was undoubtedly Monet who turned his friends' attention there. Monet himself spent the summer mainly in Le Havre or Sainte-Adresse, a small seaside resort where an aunt had an estate where the family regularly stayed during the holidays. In 1864, Monet invited his painter colleague Georges Bazille. They sailed on the Seine and first went to Honfleur which lies opposite Le Havre. Honfleur with its old alley-ways and the cool Atlantic breeze must had a great effect on Bazille who came from southern France. The town had already been discovered by many artists: Bonnington, Corot and Courbet had painted there, as had Jongkind and of course Boudin (who lived there) - they usually stayed at La Ferme Saint-Simean, an inn situated on a hill, from where they could savour the overpowering view.
War in 1870 caused Monet and Pissarro to go to England to avoid being called up for military service. Their stay there was exceptionally important for both artists. Among other things they made an exact study of Turner's work. London also opened a few doors regarding contact to art dealers. In 1871, Monet returned to Le Havre. Here he painted the sunrise above the sea in 1873 whose title "Impression: Sunrise" later gave the group of artists their name. In the painting are the silhouettes of ships in Le Havre harbour, barely recognizable in the mist, an impertinence for contemporary taste, although the theme had been painted almost fifty years before by William Turner. That painting had been much admired by Monet and Pissarro in London.
During the Franco-Prussian war the young Paul Durand-Ruel (1831-1922) moved to London where he got to know Monet and Pissarro and bought his first paintings from them. After the war, when he had established himself in Paris, he kept in contact and became one of the first art collectors of the Impressionists and often acted as a friend and patron.
The Seine was a favourite destination for Impressionist painters and the varied landscape around the river served as a motif for a great number of paintings. La Grenouillere was a popular place because of the landscape, but also because of the girls and the boatsmen who went there. In the nearby Restaurant Fournaise, Renoir painted his Oarsmen's Breakfast in which we find Aline, who was later to become his wife, playing with a little dog and - in a sportshirt - the young engineer and painter Gustave Caillebotte (1848-94). Caillebotte learned a lot from Monet (the two of them painted together several times during long excursions, and there are several paintings which have an amazing similarity), but he gained more fame as a financially secure collector. Monet and Renoir were saved from the worst by Caillebotte's help when they were in a serious financial predicament. He was a lifelong friend of Renoir's and named him as executor of his estate when he died. Renoir, who was himself fatally ill, was left with a unique collection of Impressionist masterpieces with the provison that he should convince the Louvre to accept the collection. It was only with unending effort that Renoir succeeded in persuading the museum to take the legacy.
Victor Chocquet was another of the important personalities of Impressionism. He was not a painter but a customs officer. However, he adored Impressionist painting and used all the money which he could save from his small salary to buy pictures from his Impressionist friends. In 1875, the Impressionists organized their first auction of paintings in the Hotel Drouot. It was not, however, a success. Purchases were extremely modest, and some of the public were angry at the paintings offered for sale. It came to blows and the police had to intervene to enable the auction to take place and prevent abusive behaviour. Of all the artists represented, only Berthe Morisot could be more or less satisfied, while Renoir, who was especially dependent on sales, only sold a few paintings and at miserable prices. Victor Chocquet bought his first picture from the Impressionist circle at this auction and commissioned Renoir to paint a portrait of his wife. The result was that Chocquet became one of the truest friends of Renoir, Pissarro and Cezanne. His financial means were limited, but he collected paintings with passion and solely because of his love of art, without any thought of financial speculation. There was a special bond of friendship between Chocquet and Cezanne as this reserved painter who was difficult to approach found an upright confidential relationship with this friend who resembled him a lot in character.
Impressionists Break Up
By the 1880s, after a series of successful exhibitions in Paris, the Impressionist movement began to fragment.
Some members, the purists like Monet, preferred to focus almost exclusively on the study of light. Others, like Pissarro and Sisley continued painting plein-air landscapes, but without Monet's ideological fervour. Renoir travelled and focused on figurative works - in nature and in the studio. Degas settled on genre studies and other studio work, after a period of interest in painting racehorses. Cezanne left Paris, settled in Aix-en-Provence and focused on his quest to discover natural forms - a task in which he succeeded brilliantly, inspiring Picasso and Braque to develop their early Cubist style of painting.
Later Impressionists: Neo-Impressionism, Post-Impressionism
Post-Impressionism, the name given to the general style that followed Impressionism during the 1880s and 1890s, involved the next generation of painters who were less content to be dictated to by nature (or Monet), and preferred instead to experiment with colour (eg. Henri Matisse 1869-1954, Paul Gauguin 1848-1903 and the Fauvists), with colour theory (eg. the apostle of Neo-Impressionism, the tragically short-lived Georges Seurat 1859-91), with everyday scenes (eg. Toulouse-Lautrec 1864-1901, Mary Cassatt, 1844-1926 and Edouard Vuillard 1868-1940), or with forms of expressionism (eg. Van Gogh 1853-90). Post-Impressionist painting includes a range of very different styles, whose only common denominator is discontent with merely imitating nature.
The Impact of Impressionism on Western Art
Impressionism is probably the best-loved as well as the single most identifiable style in the history of Western art. Although not as overtly revolutionery as certain modern art movements such as Cubism, anti-art Dada, or Surrealism, the impact of Impressionist painting on Modern Art was enormous. It set entirely new standards for how artists "saw9quot; and depicted nature - influencing generations of painters including numerous artistic communes, at Grez-Sur-Loing, Pont-Aven, and Concarneau in France - as well as the faraway Heidelberg School (c.1886-1900) of Australian Impressionism, led by the English-born Tom Roberts (1856-1931) and Arthur Streeton (1867-1943).
In the United States, where the tradition of Barbizon naturalism and 19th century academic realism was particularly strong, American Impressionism only took off after 1893. Until then, the style was pioneered by progressive painters like the society portraitist John Singer Sargent (1856-1925) - see his masterpiece The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit and El Jaleo (1882, Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston) - Mary Cassatt (1845-1926), William Merritt Chase (1849-1916), Theodore Robinson (1852-96), J. Alden Weir (1852-1919), John H Twachtman (1853-1902), and Childe Hassam (1859-1935).
Ultimately, by tearing up all the rules about naturalism and realism in painting, Impressionism paved the way for the modernist styles of Expressionism and even Cubism. It continues to exert a significant influence on painting today.
Famous French Impressionist Paintings
Camille Pissarro (1830-1903)
Foxhill: Upper Norwood (1870) National Gallery, London.
What subject matter appears in works by the impressionists?
The Pioneers of Impressionism
A participant in all the Impressionist exhibitions, Pissarro promoted and defended the movement from the beginning, claiming: "The Impressionists are in the right, supporting a solid art based on sensations, and it is an honest viewpoint." Widely considered to be the most consistent of the Impressionist group, Alfred Sisley (1839-99) was born in Paris of English parents. He devoted himself almost exclusively to landscapes, mostly painting the countryside to the west of Paris, where he lived. His work was dominated by images of the River Seine, the floodwaters at Port-Marly, rows of poplars, reflections on the snow, and the delicate mist that hung over the fields. The sky was an important element in his work, and he employed various techniques to create a sky that "would not be simply a background." His canvases were not highly esteemed during his lifetime and were less respected than those of the other Impressionists. Little by little his paintings lost their vitality, becoming less interesting and more simplistic. Claude Monet (1840-1926), the painter most faithful to his visual sensations, was described by Cezanne as "Only an eye but my God, what an eye!" It was Monet who encouraged the other members of the group to paint out of doors. His canvas exhibited at the first Impressionist show in 1874 was called Impression, Sunrise, which prompted the journalist Louis Leroy to label the whole group the "Impressionists9quot;. In Monet's works, form is lost in the quest to depict light. The artist took this to such extremes that he went beyond merely transcribing what he saw: with vague shapes for subjects and colours broken up into thousands of gradations, his paintings verged on the abstract. Together with Monet and Pissarro, Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) was one of the first to spread the doctrine of Impressionism at the end of the 1860s. He filled his canvases with a steady, diffused light, bringing figures and landscapes together under one rhythmic and constant source of illumination. In 1881, he visited Rome, where he found "the wisdom of Raphael '', who "like me, looks for the impossible." Impressionism, the "impossible9quot; undertaking that seemed to challenge the very shape of nature, found in Renoir's work a unique, structural solidity in his depiction of young women. These figures became increasingly more imposing but were graceful and softly lit: "I believe I have been able to achieve the grandeur of Antiquity," he declared. A friend of Renoir, Monet, and Sisley, Frederic Bazille (1841-70) was never a fully committed Impressionist. "I wish to give each subject its own weight and volume and not paint only outward appearances," he said. Tragically, Bazille's career was cut short when he was killed in action during the Franco-Prussian war.
Armand Guillaumin (1841-1927) displayed works at all the Impressionist exhibitions except those of 1876 and 1879. His palette became increasingly brilliant and unnatural. The vivid colours were arranged in sharp contrasts, similar to those found in the work of Paul Gauguin. Berthe Morisot (1841-95), the daughter of wealthy parents and a descendant of the painter Fragonard , exhibited regularly at the official Salon before opting enthusiastically to join the Impressionists. She took part in all but one of their shows and, in 1868, met Edouard Manet, who became her teacher and close friend. She later married his brother Eugene. The two artists influenced each other greatly, and it was Morisot who persuaded Manet to experiment with the "rainbow palette" of the Impressionists. In her own work, she never used the group's trademark short, broken brushstrokes but retained her own delicate, feathery technique. Morisot's women - reading, cooking, and tending to children - are solid forms with great presence, not figures swept away by the passing moment. Edouard Manet (1832-83) was in many ways separate from the Impressionists. The son of a Paris magistrate, he was a fashionable, urbane gentleman painte and friend of the poets Mallarme and Baudelaire. He sought the approval of the most influential critics and recognition from the official Salon and found their constant rejection very upsetting. In terms of influence, Manet owed his masterly handling of pigment, known as peinture claire, to Courbet and Velazquez . Later, Japanese art had a deep impact on his work, and his subjects, often finished in the studio, became more unreal and flattened. The colour was spread directly over the white canvas, with none of the half-tones of the academic painter. His first one-man exhibition, held in 1863 at the Galerie Marinet, was an important event for the Impressionists, who in the same year exhibited at the Salon des Refuses. In the 1870s, Manet, influenced by Morisot, had more contact with the group. Leaving his studio to paint outdoors, his work became lighter and more spontaneous, capturing with immediacy the farewells at a port in Departure of the Folkestone Boat (1868-71) and catching the sparkle of the water in The Seine at Argenteuil (1874). Although a regular participant in their exhibitions, Edgar Degas (1834-1917) never considered himself a true Impressionist, claiming, "There is nothing less spontaneous than my art." The son of a wealthy banker and a Creole woman, he found early inspiration in the work of the Renaissance masters. He preferred painting in his studio to out of doors and favoured artificial light over sunlight - he found it highlighted the movements of his famous ballerinas. Mary Cassatt (1844-1926), from an American banking family with French ancestors, shared with her friend Degas a special love for drawing. She exhibited with the Impressionists for the first time in 1879. Her linear style and talent for combining separate elements led her to the creation of the coloured lithographs and engravings that are among her most successful works. Giuseppe de Nittis (1846-84), a friend of Degas, Manet, Caillebotte, and Toulouse-Lautrec, participated in the first Impressionist exhibition of 1874 with five paintings. His scenes depicting the elegant society of Parisian life and his impressions of London were a great success. In 1878 he was awarded the Legion of Honour. Paul Cezanne (1839-1906) exhibited with the Impressionists in 1874 and 1877 but, like Degas, never identified himself with the group or wholly embraced their ideas. With the exception of Pissarro, with whom he shared a long and productive friendship, they did not completely understand him. When Cezanne started painting, his art was romantic, heroic, and erotic. Initially, he used thick, dark paint, but after meeting some of the group, his palette became lighter. Rather than catching fleeting impressions and the transient effects of light, he preferred to contemplate his subject in order to produce more structured, balanced, and geometric compositions. He gave up his brush for a palette knife, which was better suited to reproducing the mass and volume of his subjects, and forgot about painting atmospheres. Towards the end of his life, he returned to his home town, Aix-en-Provence, to paint nature "in the sphere, the cone, and the cylinder." He concentrated on landscapes, particularly views of Mont Sainte-Victoire, and claimed: "One must learn to paint from these simple forms; one will then be able to do whatever one wishes." Also difficult to classify as true Impressionists are the French artist and collector Gustave Caillebotte (1848-94), who painted contemporary life in a classical style, and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864-1901), whose subjects reveal a genuine sense of tragedy.
What did the Impressionists aim to doTheir subject matter and their distinctive painting method - Essay Example
What did the Impressionists aim to doTheir subject matter and their distinctive painting method
His main theme was the world of theatre and dance, which sets him apart from most other Impressionists, but he shared many of their techniques. He belonged firmly to the Realist school in his early career, but increasingly made use of the sketchiness and more unfinished brush work of the Impressionists in his later work. Nevertheless, he consistently denied that he was part of the Impressionist movement. It is a characteristic of the Impressionists as a group that they argued and squabbled with each other about who was part of the group, and who was not. They endlessly debated one others’ works, the salon critics’ opinions, and the various techniques that they used. (Rewald, 1961, p. 543) This creative chaos produced a genuine and very fruitful era of technical experimentation which influenced many later styles and movements. It was not the work of any one artist in particular, but rather a collective effort that evolved as they competed to have their works shown in the salons and appreciated by a sceptical public. The paintings were often painted beyond Paris, however, in gardens or along the river Seine. At first the juries who decided which paintings could be displayed in public galleries were not sympathetic to the new style. It was not so much the subject matter that was hard to accept at first, but way that the artists approached their work: “For the impressionist, as the name implies, the concept of the “impression” provided the theoretical means for approaching the relation of individual and universal truth. The artists’ characteristic technical devices, such as accentuated (“spontaneous”) brushwork and bright color, are signs of their . Show more