- 1 gay marriage argument essay
- 1.1 You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
- 1.2 Argument Supporting Gay Marriage Essay
- 1.3 Are Same-Sex Marriages Cool or ‘Gay?’ An Argument for Same-Sex Marriage
- 1.4 Arguments for Legalizing Gay Marriages Essays
- 1.5 Essay on A Pro-Gay Marriage Argument
- 1.6 Argument Supporting Gay Marriage Essay
- 1.7 Essay on Supporting Gay Marriage
- 1.8 Argument Analysis on Gay Marriage
- 1.9 Essay about Argument Supporting Gay Marriage
- 1.10 How Opponents to Gay Marriage Offer Illusory Arguments
- 1.11 Argument (gay marriage) - Essay Example
gay marriage argument essay
Please join StudyMode to read the full document
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
. Gay Marriage Argument The issue of legalizing gay marriage has always been a matter of great controversy in the United States. Many people believe that legalizing gay marriage is immoral and unconstitutional. “Untraditional,” “unlawful,” and “unethical” are some of the many terms used to describe gay marriage. Not all individuals feel this way. The issue has created widespread division both politically and socially. Advocates strongly believe that gay marriage is a constitutional right, while the opposition claims it has too many social disadvantages. In present day society the number of peoples in support of gay marriage is higher than ever. One of the many advocates for pro gay marriage is Evan Wolfson, the founder and president of Freedom to Marry. Wolfson presents numerous arguments for the legalization of gay marriage in his article “Without Nationwide Gay Marriage, U.S. Government Discriminates.” Using emotional, logical, and legal appeal, Wolfson presents his argument. Same-sex couples should be able to celebrate their relationships through the bondage of marriage just like heterosexual couples. Many same-sex couples want to marry and they should be able to.
. What is Gay Marriage? If you don't know then I'll tell you right now, it is a legally or socially recognized marriage between two people of the same biological sex. The issue of gay, or same-sex, marriage has become one of the most opposing public policy matters in American politics. Gay rights advocates see it as one of the gay movement's main goals and argue that gay Americans have a right as citizens to express love and commitment through marriage, as well as a right to its many legal benefits. Gay marriage opponents, who tend to be religious groups and political conservatives, see marriage as limited to one man and one woman and think that allowing same-sex couples to marry would weaken that institution. Although most states have shown no interest in approving gay marriage, and about 41 ban it, a handful of states now allow same sex marriages; including Washington DC, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, and now New York. Other states are still trapped in political and legal disputes over the gay marriage issue. The most notable example of this is California, where the state supreme court in 2008 ruled a ban on gay marriage unconstitutional but voters then restored the ban in a ballot.
. The issue of gay marriage has been stirring controversy among the nation for some years. Previously considered a taboo subject and only discussed within the gay community, the issue of gay marriage has made it to the forefront of national headlines. Many states are currently allowing the issue to be decided on by the voters. However, the gay community still faces some obstacles in their fight for equality. While the issue of gay marriages is gaining more acceptances, homosexual couples who choose to marry still face issues unlike those of interracial couples in the past. Like interracial couples in the 1950s and 1960s, homosexuals have had to fight for their rights to marry the person of his or her choosing. There were laws dating back to the beginning of this country that prohibit miscegenation, or the marrying between different races. It was not until 1964 that the Anti-Miscegenation law was overturned and marriage between the races was legal. Interracial couples faced racism, hatred, and discrimination by society. While interracial couples currently enjoy the same rights that are afforded to any other married couple, the gay community is proposing the same rights. In 1978, the United States Supreme Court declared marriage to be "of fundamental importance to all individuals” (Zablocki v. Redhail 1978). The.
. THESIS Gay marriage is an issue that affects the people of the United States ethically and politically. It is believed that DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) is discriminatory and violates the Constitution. A few States have approved gay marriage licenses, and thousands of same-sex couples have made their wish come true. Laws against gay marriage have had a direct impact on several benefits that heterosexual couples have. While the majority of the people in the United States are leaning towards acceptance of same-sex marriage, the minority it is still great. Constitutionally most of these issues would be solved in over half the states in five to ten years. However many people would still not accept gay marriage, mainly because of their religious believes. II. HISTORY OF GAY MARRIAGE A) Background Homosexuality has always existed among the human race. Until the 1990’s, most homosexuals have been hiding their sexual preferences. Since the 1970’s same-sex marriage has been an issue in the United States when nationwide gay rights organizations formed. Also during the 70’s lesbians rejected the idea of marriage, because their view of marriage was oppressive. In 1972, the U.S Supreme Court rejected a marriage license in Minnesota for.
Unbiased Gay Marriage Argument Essay
. question of whether or not to grant the right of marriage to same sex couples. Although same sex marriage has been legalized in many parts of the country, the majority is still on the fence about the issue. There are questions of if would harm the traditional institution of marriage, if it’s religiously righteous, whether it’s constitutional to ban gay marriage, as well as what it would do to the economy. The pros and cons of legalizing gay marriage are almost equal, leaving the issue unresolved. “As of May 10, 2012, gay marriage has been legalized in eight US states and the District of Columbia” (National Conference). According to the constitution, each person has the right to liberty and equality, meaning that the rights of marriage should be granted to everyone regardless of sex. “The US Supreme Court declared in 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur that the ‘freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause’” (ProCon.org). Those who are pro-gay marriage also argue that the gained revenue brought in from marriage licenses, and higher income taxes of those marriages, would be good for local and state governments. “The Comptroller for New York City found that legalizing.
Gay Marriage Controversy Research Paper
. Gay Marriage Many same-sex couples want the right to get married because they are in love. Many, in fact, have spent the last 10, 20 or 50 years with that person, and they want to honor their relationship in the greatest way our society has to offer. By making a commitment to stand together in good times and bad, through all the joys and challenges family life brings, and to show that off to the public, just like other married couples. Same sex marriage should be legalized because they have a right as individuals of the United States to love whoever they want, and whoever makes them happy, and as citizens of the U.S., they should not be discriminated against based on sexuality. To begin with, many parents want the right to marry because they know it offers children a fairly vital “safety net” and almost guarantees protections that unmarried parents cannot provide. And still other people, both gay and straight, are fighting for the right of same-sex couples to marry because they realize that it is not fair to deny some families the protection that all other families are eligible, and completely able to enjoy (Human Rights Campaign). Some may argue that having lesbian, or gay parents hinders children. On the contrary, a study done by Nanette Gartrell, a professor of psychiatry at the University of California at San Francisco (and a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles), and Henry.
. Gay Marriage in the United States The debate between whether gay marriage should be legalized or not has been a controversial topic recently. In the past twelve years, equal marriage rights have been legalized in 6 states of the U.S.. Eighteen states do not allow gay marriage and do not recognize civil unions. The other twenty six states allow civil unions, and some are debating legalizing gay marriage. Gay marriage should be legal across the United States. Not allowing gay marriage in any state is unconstitutional. If one state is to allow gay marriage, then the people that get married in that state are supposed to be legally married in all other states of the United States (Hertz). The constitution states, in article 5, that anything that a person performs in one state legally cannot be prosecuted if that person were to move to another state where it is not legal. Meaning that all of the gay marriages that take place in states where it is legal, are supposed to be legal everywhere else in the United States. Many of the arguments against gay marriage are religious, and religion and state are supposed to be separated in the United States (Waldman). The United States is supposed to be run based.
. Journal 22 Should Gay Marriage Be Legal In Texas? An Annotated bibliography According to Bothelo, a federal Texas judge did not implement the ban for same- sex marriage. The judge, stated “the current prohibition has not legitimate governmental purpose.” However the ruling by Judge Orlando Garcia will not go into effect immediately; there is a process that will take place which will not allow same- sex marriage in Texas for the time being. Bothelo, article gave the LGBT community hope that soon same sex- marriage will be recognized. Two couples who have challenged the ruling said they hope to make a payment for equality and rights for the LGBT community so they won’t have to go through the, embarrassment, in-difference they are going through. Many Texas citizens according to the article are in favor of same-sex marriage in Texas. Texas Democratic Party Chairman Gilberto Hinojosa Called Wednesday “A historic day for the lesbian and gay community.” (Pg1) Bothelo, article goes onto to say Texas still has some many obstacles to overcome before there is much celebration. Greg Abbot will be challenging the ruling to be held in New Orleans, by the federal appeal courts in the near future. Even though the Supreme Court has ruled over a numerous of times in regards to the ban. It has been to the discretion of each state to.
Two editorials were posted in the “New York Daily News” and “Times of Trenton” pertaining to the subject of legalizing gay marriage. Both articles argue the position against gay marriage and use the same focal point in their articles: the negative effects that legalizing gay marriages will have on children being raised by same sex parents. Also, both articles contain logical fallicies in their argument and use many of the same tactics to argue their point such as scare tactics, statistics, and quotes from people on the other side of the argument.
However, the “Times of Trenton” editorial is able to cover up these fallicies and present their side in a cleaner and more efficient way than the “New York Daily News” by making the statistics seem more credible, the quotes from the other side of the argument more persuasive, and the overall organization of their logic more rational. Unfortunately, the legalization of same sex marriage is a highly divided and controversial topic that our nation has been debating over since the day American was founded as a country.
While the movement persisted throughout the centuries, it was not until the turn of the millennium in the year 2000 that Vermont became the first state to allow civil unions for same sex couples. Since then, milestones have been made in the LGBT community as thirteen states have legalized same sex marriage and eight states recognizing same sex civil unions as of 2013. However, America is taking the matter at a slow pace compared to the thirteen countries that have already completely recognized same sex marriage—Denmark legalizing the practice since the late 1980s.
In fact, many states have taken a few steps backwards, such as California passing an amendment to overturn its previous decision to legalize same sex marriage along with 32 states adding amendments to ban same sex unions to their constitutions. However, the most recent polls show majority support for the legal recognition of same sex marriage, with supporters first achieving the majority in 2010. There is a general trend between supporters for same sex marriage with lack of religious fundamentalism, young age, higher education, and residence in the Northeast and West Coast.
Also, supporters come from mostly liberal and moderate political ideologies and the female gender. In opposition are mostly the South and Midwest regions, men, and conservative political ideologies. The defenders of opposite sex marriages generally argue against same sex couples raising children as well, generally basing their stance on outdated studies—many of which have been revoked by their own researchers. Both articles used research statistics to support their claim. The “NY Daily News” quoted a statement from Obama stating that children who grow up without a father are more likely to become destructive citizens of our society.
The article poorly executes the utilization of research in two ways: first they use Obama as a figure of false authority and fail to cite the origin of the research, loosening its credibility. Secondly, even if it is credible, the research overall is misinterpreted and a red herring to the argument. The research is only relevant to children who grow up without a father not directly to same gender parents—it could easily be possible that the research pertains to single parent households.
The author also sets up a straw man against Obama by stating “Obama is right. Children are better off with both a mother and a father. ” Firstly, it does not state anywhere in the quote given that Obama said children need strictly a mother and father, only that children without both parents present are more likely to end up in a poor situation. Secondly, even if the research was relevant with same gender families, it would only present a stance against children raised by two mothers instead of two fathers.
Not only is it a hasty generalization for the author to assume that this single study proves that marriage needs to involve a man and a woman, it is non-sequitur to believe that because children without fathers do not grow up well, that same gender situations where both parents are present will yield the same results. In the other article, the author uses research to support his claim slightly more efficiently—the first research study the author uses is cited and actually is directly relevant to same gender family studies.
The study showed that children raised by same sex parents are more likely to be homosexual, abuse drugs, be molested by their parents/adult figure, and participate in risky behavior. The average reader scanning over the article quickly would see the author stated where the research came from and automatically assume that it is credible. However, when the research was further investigated, it was found that not only was the study widely considered by scientists to be inconclusive. Even the author, Mark Regernus, stated in an interview that the study lacked enough foundation to make such a claim.
The article then declares there is an increase in people identifying as homosexual since 1994. The author then claims this increase falsifies the theory that people are born homosexual but instead is due to cultural factors encouraging same-sex behavior. The first mistake with this claim is that the author does not provide where this information originates. It is non sequitur to believe that because the culture is becoming more accepting of homosexuality, it increases homosexuality and debunks the theory that people are born homosexual.
More or less, this claim is a hasty generalization because the author does not consider possibilities such as culture changing to accept homosexual individuals giving people comfort and security to openly identify as homosexual. Both authors clearly stack bias evidence against homosexual behavior instead of providing or arguing against any of the available evidence that suggests being homosexual has genetic components or children from same sex families do as well as heterosexual parented families.
While the lack of arguing against evidence refuting their claims may seemingly strengthen their opinion, the blatant bias makes their argument less convincible to readers because it comes off as close-minded and opinionated rather than open and persuasive, especially to readers that support gay marriage. To strengthen their argument, both articles used quotes from the opposing side to argue their claim. Again, the “Times of Trenton” article uses this method more strongly than “New York Daily News”. The “New York Daily News” claims that the LGBT community supports the author’s thesis that gay marriage is based on a lie.
They first quote an author named Masha Gessen, a supporter of gay marriage: “Fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there—because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change. ” The author set up a straw man manipulating these words to make it appear that the LGBT community agrees with their thesis. Gessen, however, is not directly stating that gay marriage is based off a lie, but that it is a lie to say that the institution of marriage is not going to change as a result of legalizing gay marriage.
Then, the author quotes another gay marriage advocate named Judith Stacey repeatedly throughout the article essentially making evident her support for polygamy and that redefining marriage will hopefully give way to accepting polygamy. It is non sequitur and a hasty generalization to claim that if same sex marriage is legalized, it will instigate the acceptance and legalization of polygamy as well. It is also a red herring fallacy to distract the readers with irrelevant information on polygamy and somehow correlate it with the legalization of same sex marriage.
This pulls away the reader from the main issue of gay marriage and the main point the author is trying to make becomes vague to the reader. Furthermore, the credibility of using these people to represent the LGBT community is put into question. The author even states that these people are radical advocates, but the author gives the illusion that since these people support same sex marriage, the LGBT community is guilty by association and therefore shares the same opinions. The author also gives these radical advocates false authority, granting them authorization to speak for the LGBT community as a whole.
The “Times of Trenton” article uses a better source to support their argument: providing an article written by a gay man raising children. He says that Mainwaring can see why people oppose same sex marriage because “Moms and dads interact differently with their children. To give kids two moms or two days is to withhold…someone whom they desperately need and deserve. ” This quote is effective because it comes from a gay man who is actually raising children and giving his perspective, instead of radical advocates.
It persuades the reader that even if someone who is gay admits there is a problem with same gender families, then maybe it shouldn’t be allowed after all. However, this is using authority instead of evidence. If a gay man claims that children of same gender families are deprived of benefits that come with heterosexual parents, then it must be true because he’s gay and has children. While it is convincing, there is no substantial evidence to support that this is claim is applicable to all same gender families.
Argument Supporting Gay Marriage Essay
Are Same-Sex Marriages Cool or ‘Gay?’ An Argument for Same-Sex Marriage
basis. Same-sex marriage should be nationally legalized in the United States with a law or an amendment because it is a step closer to equality for everyone. There are many obstacles in the way of the national legalization of same-sex marriage. The most prevalent of these are the government’s current laws on the subject. Some of the laws that the government has ‘protecting marriage’ are nothing short of barbaric. Another obstacle to the national legalization of same-sex marriage is the current…
Arguments for Legalizing Gay Marriages Essays
Homosexual Marriage Since 1971 when the first same sex couple Richard John Baker and James Michael McConnell applied for a marriage license and were denied in the Baker vs. Nelson ruling, America has been forced to debate whether homosexuals should be allowed to be married even though they are not the classical definition of a couple. There are many opinions about this subject from government officials, religious leaders and even the president of the United States. Homosexuals should be allowed…
Essay on A Pro-Gay Marriage Argument
dropping economy, marriage is no longer a priority to some. Still to others, overlooking the fact that many no longer see marriage as crucial, they are determined to save what they consider constitutes the model for marriage. For years, marriage opportunities for homosexuals has been an ongoing debate, and it still continues today. Many critics of the ordeal pose the argument that the allowance of same-sex unions would single-handedly demolish the already fragile structure of marriage (Head). They go…
without deviance we cannot define and clarify our moral boundaries. We need gay marriage to deviate society and brake the traditional marriage/relationship and encourage equality for all. The idea of gay marriage conflicts with their idea of marriage; that somehow when two people of the opposite sex are in love it is less official. Marx (conflict theorist) states that the dominant ideology in our country is that marriage is the union of a man and a woman, therefore, two men or two women can not be…
Argument Supporting Gay Marriage Essay
right for same-sex couples to marry. Marriage is defined as a sacred bond of love between two people. Gay people also feel love therefore, they should be allowed the same rights as everyone else in this country. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with a proven biological causation. The only thing that should matter in marriage is love and denying them this is a violation of religious freedom. According to studies done by Simon LeVey, being gay is a biological cause, not a choice…
Essay on Supporting Gay Marriage
issues and those who are not. This distinction has torn apart issues like gay marriage, one of the most debated topics of our lifetime. Those against gay marriage being legalized have many reasons and opinions that give them their own personal world view and ideal of the sanctity of marriage. Those in favor of gay marriage have been known to develop arguments that relate to biology, science and acceptance. In this argument, who has the high ground? What creates and influences the ideas that are…
Argument Analysis on Gay Marriage
Argument Analysis on Gay Marriage There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. Personal characteristics, such as upbringing, culture, religion and ethnicity, all play a role in determining one's feelings on a given controversial issue. However, one of the most protested and discussed issues in current political debate is same-sex marriage. There…
Essay about Argument Supporting Gay Marriage
support of gay marriage, and "no" on bans of gay marriage. The opening scenario of Lindsey and Beth is a dilemma that is becoming more of a real situation each day. The fact is that people are forming unions regardless of the law. In all fairness, the people involved in these relationships should have the same legal rights as all other Americans that are involved in long-term relationships and decide to get married. Just like heterosexual couples who follow the traditional pattern of marriage and then…
How Opponents to Gay Marriage Offer Illusory Arguments
How Opponent to Gay Marriage offer Illusory Arguments The book The Invisible Gorilla: How Our Intuitions Deceive Us by Chabris and Simons truly makes a strong case for how six different types of illusions (or beliefs) truly disserve the human population. The six common illusions that the book discusses are the illusion of memory, the illusion of confidence, the illusion of knowledge, the illusion of cause and the illusion of potential. Chabris and Simon argue that one can see these illusions at…
Pro Gay Marriage The United States is currently embroiled in a battle over issues regarding civil rights of its citizens and what rights are constituted by that term. In the past, civil rights issues have been fought over women's rights and those of African Americans among others all in the name of seeking equality. Perhaps the most vocal group discussing civil rights in the United States at present are gay marriage activists who are fighting for same-sex couples to be able to marry. These individuals…
Argument (gay marriage) - Essay Example
Argument (gay marriage)
Gay marriages defeat the government’s purpose of benefiting marriages (Moore et al 6). Governments depend on stable families for the social health of the society they govern. One of the reasons they bestow benefits to marriages is that by their pure nature, marriages are recognized as the key institutions responsible for creating and raising the society. A faltering family falters the society. Opposite sex marriages raise children in a natural and morally acceptable atmosphere, providing both parents’ affection (Moore et al 14). Gay marriages lack such conditions. Their primary purpose is the personal pleasure of two individuals in a sterile union and is, therefore, not entitled to the protection most States extend to opposite sex marriages (Moore et al 15).
In conclusion, the natural tendency of gay marriages is not procreation or raising families (Moore et al 15). Hence, “same sex unions” do not deserve the name marriage and the benefits that come along with true marriage.
Moore, Kristin A., Jekielek, Susan M., & Emig, Carol 2002. Marriage from a Child’s Perspective: How Does Family Structure Affect Children, and What Can be Done about It? Child Trends. Washington: AEI Press, 2002. . Show more
ESSAY SAMPLE written strictly according
to your requirements
Haven't found the Essay You Want?
© New York Essays 2017. All rights reserved